Residents of a village with a “shrinking population” are divided over whether a proposed housing estate will secure or spoil its future.
Husthwaite Parish Council and numerous residents of Husthwaite and the parish council have claimed a scheme to build housing on farmland off Prospect Cottages would spoil the appearance of the historic village near Easingwold.
But the developers behind the proposal – and a significant amount of supporters – say more homes are sorely needed there.
The application to build 20 homes, including six affordable properties and single-storey housing for older people, was lodged just months after an appeal was dismissed over Hambleton District Council’s refusal of a previous, similar application on the site on the edge of the North York Moors National Park.
Last August, a planning inspector concluded: “I attach considerable importance and weight to the desirability of preserving this designated heritage asset.”
Planning papers lodged with North Yorkshire Council state the 2021 Census had revealed Husthwaite’s “shrinking population of 392”, down from 417 20 years earlier.
The papers state the schemes, which overlooks the village’s conservation area, would “assist to address the ongoing housing crisis”.
The application adds: “The proposal would have no detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the village, surrounding area and countryside or result in the loss of countryside that makes a significant contribution to the character or setting of that part of the village.
“This is because the proposal site is tucked into the corner of the field, and enclosed by built form on two sides.”
School in a precarious position
The planning application claims “the proposal has been shown to respect the overall character and appearance” of the area and “while small, provides a significant benefit to the immediate area and contributes towards the regional and national housing targets”.
Supporters of the scheme, say the revised plan includes more green space and the proposed housing “would be perfect for young families”, which are needed to sustain the primary school, which is under capacity.
One supporter wrote: “My wife and I both attended the village primary school. I understand the school is currently under-subscribed and this puts it in a precarious position.
“This is a perfect opportunity to regenerate the population of the village and bring in a younger generation.”
Another supporter added: “It is sad that new homes are routinely objected too with onerous and emotive unsubstantiated comments. Too often the vocal minority of a few objectors / NIMBYs assert too much influence on the planning process and should be given little weight.”
Location of propose development
However, following revisions to the latest proposal, Husthwaite Parish Council has stated it wishes the council to reject it.
A parish council spokesman wrote the scheme would erode the openness that contributes to the village’s rural setting and the scale and layout of this proposal would result in harm to the character and appearance of our village and wish to preserve our designated heritage site.
He wrote: “Husthwaite Parish Council remains of the view that introducing a development of 20 new houses will put a big strain on the village community support system and affect the social cohesion of our small village.”
Another objection to the scheme has been lodged on the grounds that councils approved £9.2m of funding in December to build 700 homes on brownfield sites across York and North Yorkshire, including 17 homes in nearby Raskelf.
The objector wrote the scheme is therefore “not required to meet North Yorkshire’s requirement for new and affordable housing”.